aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--_posts/2021-01-24-the-wayland-experience.md4
-rw-r--r--_site/feed.xml6
-rw-r--r--_site/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/index.html4
3 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/_posts/2021-01-24-the-wayland-experience.md b/_posts/2021-01-24-the-wayland-experience.md
index 40a54ed..c6ea9aa 100644
--- a/_posts/2021-01-24-the-wayland-experience.md
+++ b/_posts/2021-01-24-the-wayland-experience.md
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ the antiquated X11. It promises better security, performance, portability, every
it sure does deliver, provided that you're not using [unsupported graphics cards](https://www.nvidia.com/).
You can watch [this talk / rant about X11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIctzAQOe44) to get an idea about how bad it is.
-Some power users also haven't switched to Wayland because their gimmicky window manager doesn't have a
-Wayland equivalent (XMonad, Awesome, Bspwm and the others). Some may wonder "hmm maybe I can port it myself". I wrote this post to make you (re)consider that.
+Some power users also haven't switched to Wayland because their window manager doesn't have a
+Wayland equivalent (XMonad, Awesome, Bspwm and the others, all having their unique feature-set). Some may wonder "hmm maybe I can port it myself". I wrote this post to make you (re)consider that.
One of the main ideas of Wayland is that it's merely a specialised IPC protocol, and the communication is
strictly between the clients (applications on your screen mainly) and the server.
diff --git a/_site/feed.xml b/_site/feed.xml
index e09a624..a4f34b9 100644
--- a/_site/feed.xml
+++ b/_site/feed.xml
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><generator uri="https://jekyllrb.com/" version="4.1.1">Jekyll</generator><link href="/blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><link href="/blog/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" /><updated>2021-01-26T11:27:56+02:00</updated><id>/blog/feed.xml</id><title type="html">tudor’s blog</title><subtitle>the blog of Tudor Roman</subtitle><author><name>Tudor Roman</name></author><entry><title type="html">Should You Write a Wayland Compositor?</title><link href="/blog/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Should You Write a Wayland Compositor?" /><published>2021-01-26T10:59:23+02:00</published><updated>2021-01-26T10:59:23+02:00</updated><id>/blog/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience</id><content type="html" xml:base="/blog/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://wayland.freedesktop.org/&quot;&gt;Wayland&lt;/a&gt; is the “new” (13 years old already) display server technology on Linux, which is supposed to replace
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><generator uri="https://jekyllrb.com/" version="4.1.1">Jekyll</generator><link href="/blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><link href="/blog/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" /><updated>2021-01-26T23:47:53+02:00</updated><id>/blog/feed.xml</id><title type="html">tudor’s blog</title><subtitle>the blog of Tudor Roman</subtitle><author><name>Tudor Roman</name></author><entry><title type="html">Should You Write a Wayland Compositor?</title><link href="/blog/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Should You Write a Wayland Compositor?" /><published>2021-01-26T10:59:23+02:00</published><updated>2021-01-26T10:59:23+02:00</updated><id>/blog/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience</id><content type="html" xml:base="/blog/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://wayland.freedesktop.org/&quot;&gt;Wayland&lt;/a&gt; is the “new” (13 years old already) display server technology on Linux, which is supposed to replace
the antiquated X11. It promises better security, performance, portability, everything, compared to X11, and
it sure does deliver, provided that you’re not using &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nvidia.com/&quot;&gt;unsupported graphics cards&lt;/a&gt;.
You can watch &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIctzAQOe44&quot;&gt;this talk / rant about X11&lt;/a&gt; to get an idea about how bad it is.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p&gt;Some power users also haven’t switched to Wayland because their gimmicky window manager doesn’t have a
-Wayland equivalent (XMonad, Awesome, Bspwm and the others). Some may wonder “hmm maybe I can port it myself”. I wrote this post to make you (re)consider that.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Some power users also haven’t switched to Wayland because their window manager doesn’t have a
+Wayland equivalent (XMonad, Awesome, Bspwm and the others, all having their unique feature-set). Some may wonder “hmm maybe I can port it myself”. I wrote this post to make you (re)consider that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the main ideas of Wayland is that it’s merely a specialised IPC protocol, and the communication is
strictly between the clients (applications on your screen mainly) and the server.&lt;/p&gt;
diff --git a/_site/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/index.html b/_site/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/index.html
index e4bd28b..34a70ef 100644
--- a/_site/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/index.html
+++ b/_site/technical/2021/01/26/the-wayland-experience/index.html
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ the antiquated X11. It promises better security, performance, portability, every
it sure does deliver, provided that you’re not using <a href="https://www.nvidia.com/">unsupported graphics cards</a>.
You can watch <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIctzAQOe44">this talk / rant about X11</a> to get an idea about how bad it is.</p>
-<p>Some power users also haven’t switched to Wayland because their gimmicky window manager doesn’t have a
-Wayland equivalent (XMonad, Awesome, Bspwm and the others). Some may wonder “hmm maybe I can port it myself”. I wrote this post to make you (re)consider that.</p>
+<p>Some power users also haven’t switched to Wayland because their window manager doesn’t have a
+Wayland equivalent (XMonad, Awesome, Bspwm and the others, all having their unique feature-set). Some may wonder “hmm maybe I can port it myself”. I wrote this post to make you (re)consider that.</p>
<p>One of the main ideas of Wayland is that it’s merely a specialised IPC protocol, and the communication is
strictly between the clients (applications on your screen mainly) and the server.</p>